JSON-LD - Linked Data Expression in JSON

1.1 How to Read this Document

This document is a detailed specification for a serialization of JSON for Linked data. The document is primarily intended for the following audiences:

• Web developers that want to understand the design decisions and language syntax for JSON-LD.
• Software developers that want to encode Microformats, RDFa, or Microdata in a way that is cross-language compatible via JSON.
• Software developers that want to write processors for JSON-LD.

To understand this specification you must first be familiar with JSON, which is detailed in [RFC4627] and [RDF-CONCEPTS].

1.2 Contributing

There are a number of ways that one may participate in the development of this specification:

• All comments and discussion takes place on the public mailing list: public-linked-json@w3.org
• Specification bugs and issues should be reported in the issue tracker.
• Source code for the specification can be found on Github.
• The #json-ld IRC channel is available for real-time discussion on irc.freenode.net.

2.1 Goals

A number of design considerations were explored during the creation of this markup language:

Simplicity

Developers don't need to know RDF in order to use the basic functionality provided by JSON-LD.

Compatibility

The JSON-LD markup should be 100% compatible with JSON.

Expressiveness

All major RDF concepts must be expressible via the JSON-LD syntax.

Terseness

The JSON-LD syntax must be very terse and human readable.

Zero Edits, most of the time

JSON-LD provides a mechanism that allows developers to specify context in a way that is out-of-band. This allows organizations that have already deployed large JSON-based infrastructure to add meaning to their JSON in a way that is not disruptive to their day-to-day operations and is transparent to their current customers. At times, mapping JSON to RDF can become difficult - in these instances, rather than having JSON-LD support esoteric markup, we chose not to support the use case and support a simplified syntax instead. So, while we strive for Zero Edits, it was not always possible without adding great complexity to the language.

Streaming

The format supports both document-based and stream-based processing.

2.2 Map Terms to IRIs

Establishing a mechanism to map JSON values to IRIs will help in the mapping of JSON objects to RDF. This does not mean that JSON-LD must be restrictive in declaring a set of terms, rather, experimentation and innovation should be supported as part of the core design of JSON-LD. There are, however, a number of very small design criteria that can ensure that developers will generate good RDF data that will create value for the greater semantic web community and JSON/REST-based Web Services community.

We will be using the following JSON object as the example for this section:

{
  "a": "Person",
  "name": "Manu Sporny",
  "homepage": "http://manu.sporny.org/"
  "avatar": "http://twitter.com/account/profile_image/manusporny"
}

2.3 The JSON-LD Context

A context is used in RDFa to allow developers to use aliases for IRIs. The semantic web, just like the document-based web, uses IRIs for unambiguous identification. The idea is that these terms mean something, which you will eventually want to query. The semantic web specifies this via Vocabulary Documents. The IRI http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ specifies a Vocabulary Document, and name is a term in that vocabulary. Join the two items together and you have an unambiguous identifier for a vocabulary term. The Compact URI Expression, or short-form, is foaf:name and the expanded-form is http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name. This vocabulary term identifies the given name for something, for example - a person's name.

Developers, and machines, would be able to use this IRI (plugging it directly into a web browser, for instance) to go to the term and get a definition of what the term means. Much like we can use WordNet today to see the definition of words in the English language. Machines need the same sort of dictionary of terms, and URIs provide a way to ensure that these terms are unambiguous.

The context provides a collection of vocabulary terms that can be used for a JSON object.

2.4 Unambiguous Identifiers for JSON

If a set of terms, like Person, name, and homepage, are defined in a context, and that context is used to resolve the names in JSON objects, machines could automatically expand the terms to something meaningful and unambiguous, like this:

{
  "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person",
  "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name": "Manu Sporny",
  "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage": "http://manu.sporny.org"
  "http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#avatar": "http://twitter.com/account/profile_image/manusporny"
}

Doing this would mean that JSON would start to become unambiguously machine-readable, play well with the semantic web, and basic markup wouldn't be that much more complex than basic JSON markup. A win, all around.

2.5 Mashing Up Vocabularies

Developers would also benefit by allowing other vocabularies to be used automatically with their JSON API. There are over 200 Vocabulary Documents that are available for use on the Web today. Some of these vocabularies are:

• RDF - for describing information about objects on the semantic web.
• RDFS - for expressing things like labels and comments.
• XSD - for specifying basic types like strings, integers, dates and times.
• Dublin Core - for describing creative works.
• FOAF - for describing social networks.
• Calendar - for specifying events.
• SIOC - for describing discussions on blogs and websites.
• CCrel - for describing Creative Commons and other types of licenses.
• GEO - for describing geographic location.
• VCard - for describing organizations and people.
• DOAP - for describing projects.

Since these vocabularies are very popular, they are pre-defined in something called the default context, which is a set of vocabulary prefixes that are pre-loaded in all JSON-LD processors. The contents of the default context are provided later in this document. Using the default context allows developers to express data unambiguously, like so:

{
  "rdf:type": "foaf:Person",
  "foaf:name": "Manu Sporny",
  "foaf:homepage": "http://manu.sporny.org/",
  "sioc:avatar": "http://twitter.com/account/profile_image/manusporny"
}

Developers can also specify their own Vocabulary documents by modifying the default context in-line using the @context keyword, like so:

{
  "@context": { "myvocab": "http://example.org/myvocab#" },
  "a": "foaf:Person",
  "foaf:name": "Manu Sporny",
  "foaf:homepage": "http://manu.sporny.org/",
  "sioc:avatar": "http://twitter.com/account/profile_image/manusporny",
  "myvocab:personality": "friendly"
}

The @context keyword is used to change how the JSON-LD processor evaluates key-value pairs. In this case, it was used to map one string ('myvocab') to another string, which is interpreted as a IRI. In the example above, the myvocab string is replaced with "http://example.org/myvocab#" when it is detected. In the example above, "myvocab:personality" would expand to "http://example.org/myvocab#personality".

This mechanism is a short-hand for RDF, called a CURIE, and provides developers an unambiguous way to map any JSON value to RDF.

2.6 An Example of a Context

JSON-LD strives to ensure that developers don't have to change the JSON that is going into and being returned from their Web applications. A JSON-LD aware Web Service may define a known context. For example, the following default context could apply to all incoming Web Service calls previously accepting only JSON data:

{
  "@context": 
  {
    "@vocab": "http://example.org/default-vocab#",
    "@base": "http://example.org/baseurl/",
    "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#",
    "dc": "http://purl.org/dc/terms/",
    "foaf": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/",
    "sioc": "http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#",
    "cc": "http://creativecommons.org/ns#",
    "geo": "http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#",
    "vcard": "http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#",
    "cal": "http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical#",
    "doap": "http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#",
    "Person": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person",
    "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
    "homepage": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage"
    "@coerce": 
    {
      "xsd:anyURI": ["foaf:homepage", "foaf:member"],
      "xsd:integer": "foaf:age"
    }
  }
}

The @vocab string is a special keyword that states that any term that doesn't resolve to a term or a prefix should be appended to the @vocab IRI. This is done to ensure that terms can be transformed to an IRI at all times.

The @base string is a special keyword that states that any relative IRI must be appended to the string specified by @base.

The @coerce keyword is used to specify type coersion rules for the data. For each key in the map, the key is the type to be coerced to and the value is the vocabulary term to be coerced. Type coersion for the key xsd:anyURI asserts that all vocabulary terms listed should undergo coercion to an IRI, including @base processing for relative IRIs and CURIE processing for compact URI Expressions like foaf:homepage.

3.1 RDFa

The following example describes three people with their respective names and homepages.

<div prefix="foaf: http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
   <ul>
      <li typeof="foaf:Person">
        <a rel="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/bob/" property="foaf:name" >Bob</a>
      </li>
      <li typeof="foaf:Person">
        <a rel="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/eve/" property="foaf:name" >Eve</a>
      </li>
      <li typeof="foaf:Person">
        <a rel="foaf:homepage" href="http://example.com/manu/" property="foaf:name" >Manu</a>
      </li>
   </ul>
</div>

An example JSON-LD implementation is described below, however, there are other ways to mark-up this information such that the context is not repeated.

[
 {
   "@": "_:bnode1",
   "a": "foaf:Person",
   "foaf:homepage": "http://example.com/bob/",
   "foaf:name": "Bob"
 },
 {
   "@": "_:bnode2",
   "a": "foaf:Person",
   "foaf:homepage": "http://example.com/eve/",
   "foaf:name": "Eve"
 },
 {
   "@": "_:bnode3",
   "a": "foaf:Person",
   "foaf:homepage": "http://example.com/manu/",
   "foaf:name": "Manu"
 }
]

3.2 Microformats

The following example uses a simple Microformats hCard example to express how the Microformat is represented in JSON-LD.

<div class="vcard">
 <a class="url fn" href="http://tantek.com/">Tantek Çelik</a>
</div>

The representation of the hCard expresses the Microformat terms in the context and uses them directly for the url and fn properties. Also note that the Microformat to JSON-LD processor has generated the proper URL type for http://tantek.com.

{
  "@context": 
  {
    "vcard": "http://microformats.org/profile/hcard#vcard",
    "url": "http://microformats.org/profile/hcard#url",
    "fn": "http://microformats.org/profile/hcard#fn",
    "@coerce": { "xsd:anyURI": "url" }
  },
  "@": "_:bnode1",
  "a": "vcard",
  "url": "http://tantek.com/",
  "fn": "Tantek Çelik"
}

3.3 Microdata

The Microdata example below expresses book information as a Microdata Work item.

<dl itemscope
    itemtype="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Work"
    itemid="http://purl.oreilly.com/works/45U8QJGZSQKDH8N">
 <dt>Title</dt>
 <dd><cite itemprop="http://purl.org/dc/terms/title">Just a Geek</cite></dd>
 <dt>By</dt>
 <dd><span itemprop="http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator">Wil Wheaton</span></dd>
 <dt>Format</dt>
 <dd itemprop="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#realization"
     itemscope
     itemtype="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Expression"
     itemid="http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596007683.BOOK">
  <link itemprop="http://purl.org/dc/terms/type" href="http://purl.oreilly.com/product-types/BOOK">
  Print
 </dd>
 <dd itemprop="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#realization"
     itemscope
     itemtype="http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Expression"
     itemid="http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596802189.EBOOK">
  <link itemprop="http://purl.org/dc/terms/type" href="http://purl.oreilly.com/product-types/EBOOK">
  Ebook
 </dd>
</dl>

Note that the JSON-LD representation of the Microdata information stays true to the desires of the Microdata community to avoid contexts and instead refer to items by their full IRI.

[
  {
    "@": "http://purl.oreilly.com/works/45U8QJGZSQKDH8N",
    "a": "http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Work",
    "http://purl.org/dc/terms/title": "Just a Geek",
    "http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator": "Whil Wheaton",
    "http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#realization": 
      ["http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596007683.BOOK", "http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596802189.EBOOK"]
  },
  {
    "@": "http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596007683.BOOK",
    "a": "http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Expression",
    "http://purl.org/dc/terms/type": "http://purl.oreilly.com/product-types/BOOK"
  },
  {
    "@": "http://purl.oreilly.com/products/9780596802189.EBOOK",
    "a": "http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Expression",
    "http://purl.org/dc/terms/type": "http://purl.oreilly.com/product-types/EBOOK"
  }
]

5.1 IRIs

Expressing IRIs are fundamental to Linked Data as that is how most subjects and many objects are identified. IRIs can be expressed in a variety of different ways in JSON-LD.

1. In general, an IRI is generated if it is in the key position in an associative array. There are special rules for processing keys in @context and when dealing with keys that start with the @ character.
2. An IRI is generated for the value specified using @, if it is a string.
3. An IRI is generated for the value specified using a.
4. An IRI is generated for the value specified using the @iri keyword.
5. An IRI is generated when there are @coerce rules in effect for xsd:anyURI for a particular vocabulary term.

An example of IRI generation for a key outside of a @context:

{
...
  "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name": "Manu Sporny",
...
}

In the example above, the key http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name is interpreted as an IRI, as opposed to being interpreted as a string..

CURIE expansion also occurs for keys in JSON-LD:

{
...
  "foaf:name": "Manu Sporny",
...
}

foaf:name above will automatically expand out to the IRI http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name.

An IRI is generated when a value is associated with a key using the @iri keyword:

{
...
  "foaf:homepage": { "@iri": "http://manu.sporny.org" }
...
}

If type coercion rules are specified in the @context for a particular vocabulary term, an IRI is generated:

{
  "@context": 
  { 
    "@coerce": 
    {
      "xsd:anyURI": "foaf:homepage"
    } 
  }
...
  "foaf:homepage": "http://manu.sporny.org",
...
}

5.2 Identifying the Subject

A subject is declared using the @ key. The subject is the first piece of information needed by the JSON-LD processor in order to create the (subject, property, object) tuple, also known as a triple.

{
...
  "@": "http://example.org/people#joebob",
...
}

The example above would set the subject to the IRI http://example.org/people#joebob.

5.3 Specifying the Type

The type of a particular subject can be specified using the a key. Specifying the type in this way will generate a triple of the form (subject, type, type-url).

{
...
  "@": "http://example.org/people#joebob",
  "a": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person",
...
}

The example above would generate the following triple (in N-Triples notation):

<http://example.org/people#joebob> 
   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
      <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person> .

5.4 Plain Literals

Regular text strings are called "plain literals" in RDF and are easily expressed using regular JSON strings.

{
...
  "foaf:name": "Mark Birbeck",
...
}

5.5 Language Specification in Plain Literals

JSON-LD makes an assumption that plain literals with associated language encoding information is not very common when used in JavaScript and Web Services. Thus, it takes a little more effort to express plain literals in a specified language.

{
...
  "foaf:name": 
  {
    "@literal": "花澄",
    "@language": "ja"
  }
...
}

The example above would generate a plain literal for 花澄 and associate the ja language tag with the triple that is generated. Languages must be expressed in [BCP47] format.

5.6 Typed Literals

Literals may also be typed in JSON-LD in two ways:

1. By utilizing the @coerce keyword.
2. By utilizing the expanded form for specifying objects.

The first example uses the @coerce keyword to express a typed literal:

{
  "@context": 
  { 
    "@coerce": 
    {
      "xsd:dateTime": "dc:modified"
    }
  }
...
  "dc:modified": "2010-05-29T14:17:39+02:00",
...
}

The second example uses the expanded form for specifying objects:

{
...
  "dc:modified": 
  {
    "@literal": "2010-05-29T14:17:39+02:00",
    "@datatype": "xsd:dateTime"
  }
...
}

Both examples above would generate an object with the literal value of 2010-05-29T14:17:39+02:00 and the datatype of http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime.

5.7 Multiple Objects for a Single Property

A JSON-LD author can express multiple triples in a compact way by using arrays. If a subject has multiple values for the same property, the author may express each property as an array.

{
...
  "@": "http://example.org/people#joebob",
  "foaf:nick": ["joe", "bob", "jaybee"],
...
}

The markup shown above would generate the following triples:

<http://example.org/people#joebob> 
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/nick>
      "joe" .
<http://example.org/people#joebob> 
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/nick>
      "bob" .
<http://example.org/people#joebob> 
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/nick>
      "jaybee" .

5.8 Multiple Typed Literals for a Single Property

Multiple typed literals may also be expressed using the expanded form for objects:

{
...
  "@": "http://example.org/articles/8",
  "dcterms:modified": 
  [
    {
      "@literal": "2010-05-29T14:17:39+02:00",
      "@datatype": "xsd:dateTime"
    },
    {
      "@literal": "2010-05-30T09:21:28-04:00",
      "@datatype": "xsd:dateTime"
    }
  ]
...
}

The markup shown above would generate the following triples:

<http://example.org/articles/8> 
   <http://purl.org/dc/terms/modified>
      "2010-05-29T14:17:39+02:00"^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime .
<http://example.org/articles/8> 
   <http://purl.org/dc/terms/modified>
      "2010-05-30T09:21:28-04:00"^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime .

5.9 Blank Nodes

At times, it becomes necessary to be able to express information without being able to specify the subject. Typically, this is where blank nodes come into play. In JSON-LD, blank node identifiers are automatically created if a subject is not specified using the @ keyword. However, authors may name blank nodes by using the special _ CURIE prefix.

{
...
  "@": "_:foo",
...
}

The example above would set the subject to _:foo, which can then be used later on in the JSON-LD markup to refer back to the named blank node.

6.1 Automatic Typing

Since JSON is capable of expressing typed information such as doubles, integers, and boolean values. As demonstrated below, JSON-LD utilizes that information to create Typed Literals:

{
...
  // The following two values are automatically converted to a type of xsd:double
  // and both values are equivalent to each other.
  "measure:cups": 5.3,
  "measure:cups": 5.3e0,
  // The following value is automatically converted to a type of xsd:double as well
  "space:astronomicUnits": 6.5e73,
  // The following value should never be converted to a language-native type
  "measure:stones": { "@literal": "4.8", "@datatype": "xsd:decimal" },
  // This value is automatically converted to having a type of xsd:integer
  "chem:protons": 12,
  // This value is automatically converted to having a type of xsd:boolean
  "sensor:active": true,
...
}

When dealing with a number of modern programming languages, including JavaScript ECMA-262, there is no distinction between xsd:decimal and xsd:double values. That is, the number 5.3 and the number 5.3e0 are treated as if they were the same. When converting from JSON-LD to a language-native format and back, datatype information is lost in a number of these languages. Thus, one could say that 5.3 is a xsd:decimal and 5.3e0 is an xsd:double in JSON-LD, but when both values are converted to a language-native format the datatype difference between the two is lost because the machine-level representation will almost always be a double. Implementers should be aware of this potential round-tripping issue between xsd:decimal and xsd:double. Specifically objects with a datatype of xsd:decimal must not be converted to a language native type.

6.2 Type Coercion

JSON-LD supports the coercion of types to ensure that the zero-edit goal of JSON-LD can be accomplished. Type coercion allows someone deploying JSON-LD to coerce and incoming or outgoing types to the proper RDF type based on a mapping of type IRIs to RDF types. Using type conversion, one may convert simple JSON data to properly typed RDF data.

The example below demonstrates how a JSON-LD author can coerce values to plain literals, typed literals and IRIs.

{
  "@context": 
  {  
     "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#",
     "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#",
     "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
     "age": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age",
     "homepage": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage",
     "@type":
     {
        "xsd:integer": "age",
        "xsd:anyURI": "homepage",
     }
  },
  "name": "John Smith",
  "age": "41",
  "homepage": "http://example.org/home/"
}

The example above would generate the following triples:

_:bnode1
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name>
      "John Smith" .
_:bnode1
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age>
      "41"^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer .
_:bnode1
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage>
      <http://example.org/home/> .

7.1 JavaScript

It is expected that JSON-LD will be used quite a bit in JavaScript environments, however, features like the expanded form for object values mean that using JSON-LD directly in JavaScript may be annoying without a middleware layer such as a simple library that converts JSON-LD markup before JavaScript uses it. One could say that JSON-LD is a good fit for the RDF API, which enables a variety of RDF-based Web Applications, but some don't want to require that level of functionality just to use JSON-LD. The group is still discussing the best way to proceed, so input on how JSON-LD could more easily be utilized in JavaScript environments would be very much appreciated.

7.2 Schema-less Databases

Databases such as CouchDB and MongoDB allow the creation of schema-less data stores. RDF is a type of schema-less data model and thus lends itself to databases such as CouchDB and MongoDB. Both of these databases can use JSON-LD as their storage format. The group needs feedback from CouchDB and MongoDB experts regarding the usefulness of JSON-LD in those environments.

8.1 Vocabulary Profiles

One of the more powerful features of RDFa 1.1 Core is the ability to specify a collection of prefixes and terms that can be re-used by a processor to simplfy markup. JSON-LD provides a similar mechanism called Vocabulary Profiles, which is the inclusion of a context external to the JSON-LD document.

The example below demonstrates how one may specify an external Vocabulary Profile. Assume the following profile exists at this imaginary URL: http://example.org/profiles/contacts.

{
  "@context": 
  {
     "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#",
     "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
     "age": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age",
     "homepage": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage",
     "#types":
     {
        "age": "xsd:integer",
        "homepage": "xsd:anyURI",
     }
  }
}

The profile listed above can be used in the following way:

{
  "@profile": "http://example.org/profiles/contacts",
  "name": "John Smith",
  "age": "41",
  "homepage": "http://example.org/home/"
}

The example above would generate the following triples:

_:bnode1
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name>
      "John Smith" .
_:bnode1
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age>
      "41"^^http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer .
_:bnode1
   <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage>
      <http://example.org/home/> .

8.2 Disjoint Graphs

When serializing an RDF graph that contains two or more sections of the graph which are entirely disjoint, one must use an array to express the graph as two graphs. This may not be acceptable to some authors, who would rather express the information as one graph. Since, by definition, disjoint graphs require there to be two top-level objects, JSON-LD utilizes a mechanism that allows disjoint graphs to be expressed using a single graph.

Assume the following RDF graph:

<http://example.org/people#john> 
   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
      <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person> .
<http://example.org/people#jane> 
   <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
      <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person> .

Since the two subjects are entirely disjoint with one another, it is impossible to express the RDF graph above using a single JSON-LD associative array.

In JSON-LD, one can use the subject to express disjoint graphs as a single graph:

{
  "@": 
  [
    {
      "@": "http://example.org/people#john",
      "a": "foaf:Person"
    },
    {
      "@": "http://example.org/people#jane",
      "a": "foaf:Person"
    }
  ]
}

A disjoint graph could also be expressed like so:

[
  {
    "@": "http://example.org/people#john",
    "a": "foaf:Person"
  },
  {
    "@": "http://example.org/people#jane",
    "a": "foaf:Person"
  }
]

8.3 The JSON-LD API

This API provides a clean mechanism that enables developers to convert JSON-LD data into a format that is easier to work with in various programming languages.

[NoInterfaceObject]
interface JSONLDProcessor {
    object toProjection (in DOMString jsonld, in object? template, in DOMString? subject, in optional JSONLDParserCallback? callback);
    Graph  toGraph (in DOMString jsonld, in optional JSONLDParserCallback? callback);
};

The JSONLDParserCallback is called whenever a processing error occurs on input data.

[NoInterfaceObject Callback]
interface JSONLDProcessorCallback {
    void error (in DOMString error);
};

The following example demonstrates how to convert JSON-LD to a projection that is directly usable in a programming environment:

// retrieve JSON-LD from a Web Service
var jsonldString = fetchPerson();

// This map, usually defined once per script, defines how to map incoming 
// JSON-LD to JavaScript objects
var myTemplate = { "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name" : "name",
                   "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age" : "age",
                  "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage" : "homepage" };

// Map the JSON-LD to a language-native object
var person = jsonld.toProjection(jsonldString, myTemplate);

// Use the language-native object
alert(person.name + " is " + person.age + " years old. " +
      "Their homepage is: " + person.homepage);

A JSON-LD Serializer is also available to map a language-native object to JSON-LD.

[NoInterfaceObject]
interface JSONLDSerializer {
    DOMString normalize (in object obj);
};

The Normalization Algorithm

This algorithm is very rough, untested, and probably contains many bugs. Use at your own risk. It will change in the coming months.

The JSON-LD normalization algorithm is as follows:

1. Remove the @context key and preserve it as the transformation map while running this algorithm.
2. For each key
   1. If the key is a CURIE, expand the CURIE to an IRI using the transformation map.
3. For each value
   1. If the value should be type coerced per the transformation map, ensure that it is transformed to the new value.
   2. If the value is a CURIE, expand the CURIE to an IRI using the transformation map.
   3. If the value is a Typed Literal and the type is a CURIE, expand it to an IRI using the transformation map.
   4. When generating the final value, use expanded object value form to store all IRIs, typed literals and plain literals with language information.
4. Output each sorted key-value pair without any extraneous whitespace. If the value is an associative array, perform this algorithm, starting at step #1, recursively on the sub-tree. There should be no nesting in the outputted JSON data. That is, the top-most element should be an array. Each item in the array contains a single subject with a corresponding array of properties in UTF-8 sort order. Any related objects that are complex objects themselves should be given a top-level object in the top-level array.

Note that normalizing named blank nodes is impossible at present since one would have to specify a blank node naming algorithm. For the time being, you cannot normalize graphs that contain named blank nodes. However, normalizing graphs that contain non-named blank nodes is supported.

var myObj = { "@context" : { 
                "xsd" : "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#",
                "name" : "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
                "age" : "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age",
                "homepage" : "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage",
                "@type": {
                   "xsd:nonNegativeInteger": "age",
                   "xsd:anyURI": "homepage"
                }
              },
              "name" : "Joe Jackson",
              "age" : 42,
              "homepage" : "http://example.org/people/joe" };

// Map the language-native object to JSON-LD
var jsonldText = jsonld.normalize(myObj);

After the code in the example above has executed, the jsonldText value will be (line-breaks added for readability):

[{"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/age":{"@datatype":"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#nonNegativeInteger","@literal":"42"},
"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage":{"@iri":"http://example.org/people/joe"},
"http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name":"Joe Jackson"}]

When normalizing xsd:double values, implementers must ensure that the normalized value is a string. In order to generate the string from a double value, output equivalent to the printf("%1.6e", value) function in C must be used where "%1.6e" is the string formatter and value is the value to be converted.

To convert the a double value in JavaScript, implementers can use the following snippet of code:

// the variable 'value' below is the JavaScript native double value that is to be converted
(value).toExponential(6).replace(/(e(?:\+|-))([0-9])$/, '$10$2')

When data needs to be normalized, JSON-LD authors should not use values that are going to undergo automatic conversion. This is due to the lossy nature of xsd:double values.